When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators. – P.J. O'Rourke
We've all experienced this, but I didn't give it much thought until now. We are constantly bombarded with selling propositions, and we've kind of taken them for granted as one of the necessary evils of a market based society. But, there is a toll. Let me share a recent example. This week I went to a fast food restaurant. I knew what I wanted, and drove up to the window to place my order.
order gal: Would you like to try our taco sald?
me: No, thanks; I'd like a double thickburger with cheese, pickle, mustard, and onion. Diet Coke. That's all.
order gal: Do you want a combo?
me: "No."
order gal: What do you want on the sandwich?
me: (thinking: how did she miss this the first time?) "uh, that would be cheese pickle mustard and onion."
order gal: and did you want fries?
me: (thinking: didn't I just say no to the fries?) "No, no fries."
order gal: anything else?
me: (thinking: I believe I said that's all sometime back there) "No."
order gal: So that's one double thickburger, hold the mayo, lettuce, and tomato, and a diet coke, right?
me: (thinking: is holding the lettuce mayo and tomato the same thing as putting cheese pickle mustard and onion on it? I could only hope) "I guess so."
As I drove up to the second window, I realized that this operator had forced me to say no at least 3 times (most of these directly attributable to her training), and read back an order that required intimate familiarity with the standard sandwich to resolve. Frankly my appetite was not at all the same by the time I completed this transaction. Why would an organization force me to repeatedly and specifically decline what I do not want in the process of getting what I do want? All these no's have a tendency to put the transaction in negative terms, so that by the time I'm done, I feel like I've just conducted a salary review.
All I wanted was a sandwich. And a Diet Coke.
Now the relevance (this is a political blog, after all). All I want is a limited government. So, when George Bush says he wants to put more tax dollars into math and science education, I think: it isn't the governments job to spend my money. So that's a rock on the negative side of the scale. Enough of those little rocks can ruin a saner man's day. No wonder politics riles so many folks.
If I wasn't an optimist by nature, I don't know how I'd get through the day at all.
4 comments:
Could be worse. You could have said no to the fries and had them shoved down your throat anyway.
Like happened in Iraq. Nobody wanted that war except the king, but we got it anyway. And so far we've been billed $727 per person to pay for it, not counting the amount we're paying for higher oil prices in the present and the price we'll pay in the future when all those maimed soldiers claim their benefits.
(As Mark Twain said, kings is mostly rapscallions.)
Anyway, between royal spending on war and royal spending on math & science education, I'll take math & science. With an extra packet of ketchup.
Anonymous, you must be a real joy to be around, and just the life of the party.
Nice weater we've been having latey...
Yeah, well the weather in Iraq, where btw Bushie is waging an illegal war for oil, sucks!
Hmmm...gonna watch the big game this weekend?
Game, Evil Republipukes think war is a game, evil King Bush...
Yeah, if you'll excuse me, I think I need to go get a root canal, sounds more fun than talking with you, moonbat!
Max Weber called politics "the slow boring of hard boards."
It may not be a job for an optimist.
"Like happened in Iraq. Nobody wanted that war except the king, but we got it anyway. "
If I recall correctly, what we "asked for" was the defeat of Al Quaida, and we more or less got that. It was arguably necessary to take out Saddam in the process, so I don't have a big quarrel with that war. What we're left with, however, is becoming this huge welfare program and social engineering experiment, and that's the problem I have with it.
The solution is to break it up into three countries, and let each country do their own constitution. It probably hasn't occurred to our throne-room full of nation builders that that's the solution.
In the meantime, the pollsters are still asking the wrong questions, because the polls are not designed to measure, they are designed to editorialize.
Post a Comment