Lincoln? Really?

Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better -- Abraham Lincoln, January, 1948

You will take possession by military force of the printing establishments of the New York World and Journal of Commerce ... and prohibit any further publication thereof.... You are therefore commanded forthwith to arrest and imprison ... the editors, proprietors and publishers of the aforementioned newspapers. -- Abraham Lincoln, May 18, 1864

It was interesting to see Barry invoke the name of Abraham Lincoln, what with the Lincoln trail train ride, the other comparisons to the Great Centralizer; and the press eagerly connects the two as if it were a good thing for Obama. If indeed Barry Obama is going to remind us of Abraham Lincoln, it might be instructive to consider what particular aspects of Lincoln we are supposed to invoke in comparison:

Would it be the Abraham Lincoln who, apparently changing his mind on the concept of secession, arrested the Mayor of Baltimore for his secessionist beliefs?

Would it be the Abraham Lincoln who started an illegal deadly war, one that still can not be easily named?

How about the one who suspends habeus corpus and dismisses enumerated powers in favor of his own idea of a Constitution?

Would it be The Real Abraham Lincoln, the one who established the first American military draft? And confiscated firearms.

The one who nationalized the transportation industry and the money supply?

Sadly, I can picture Barry doing all these things, and can almost guarantee he wouldn't even feel the shame of it, just as Lincoln surely did not. I have my image of the parallels drawn between Obama and Lincoln, but to be sure it casts no favorable light on the 44th president.

Jimmy = Barry

So disaffected was bicentennial America that it sought leaders unconnected to the establishment. In Jimmy Carter, voters found a candidate whose main qualifications were his lack of experience and connections within the Beltway or corporate worlds. Like Barack Obama, Carter claimed to rise above failed partisanship, while his New South background allowed him to symbolize racial healing. Carter, like Obama, sold himself mainly on the virtues of his character. He presented himself as a man of simple honesty, faith, and decency, and his lack of a track record allowed voters to see in him what they wanted, however far-fetched those hopes might be. If they hadn’t believed it, they wouldn’t have seen it with their own eyes. Above all, Carter promised change, a message that carried weight as long as its details remained nonspecific. The problem with messiahs from nowhere is that when they do exercise power, people discover to their horror what their leader’s actual views and talents are. The disillusion can be dreadful. -- Philip Jenkins, The American Conservative

I believe that people see the person they want to see when they are sizing someone up for the first time. A lot of people see Barry Obama as a sort of a fair-minded, even-handed, reasonable sort of a guy, who can convince a nation to do the right thing. Many people never get beyond the first look before pulling the lever. They want to believe that Barry is the guy they hope he is.

The last person your Wizer ever voted for for president who actually won was (believe it or not) Jimmy Carter. I spent the next 32 years regretting that vote. Like many Americans, I saw a certain simplicity and innocence there; only to find too late that his vision was not at all the same as mine. Not even close. It wasn't until after the election that I realized that I had been had. The best candidate in 1976 was not Gerald Ford, of course. It was Robert Ringer.

Forget Blagojevich. Yes, Barry and Rod were brought to you by the same Illinois political machine, but Barry will have all the teflon he needs to get through the next four years, courtesy of what's left of the mainstream media. Besides, Barry is the person people voted for, and they will defend him until he is irretrievably broken. What's really unfortunate is what's going to happen in government in the meantime. When that mess is made, we will all wish we never voted for Carter all over again.

Wizer One-Liner #20

So, with hurricanes and other natural disasters, the government (i.e., FEMA) is supposed to fix it; but with government created disasters (like the credit crisis), well, no, that's different.

Witch!

A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world--no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men. --President Woodrow Wilson


From now on, depressions will be scientifically created. -- Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. , 1913

It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. -- Henry Ford

It is probably because Rick Wagoner understands. Rick Wagoner is chairman and CEO of General Motors. Chris Dodd is pointing at Wagoner and screaming "Witch!"

I believe that the longer Wagoner stays in the public eye, the sooner the truth of the origin of the financial crisis becomes clear. It's the last thing Dodd wants to see. If he can waste Wagoner, a convenient scapegoat is created., and maybe the heat comes off.

For those unclear on the link between the current crisis and Senator Dodd, here's sauce for the gander.

A Silver Lining

A rigid economy of the public contributions and absolute interdiction of all useless expenses will go far towards keeping the government honest and unoppressive. -- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Lafayette, 1823

A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives. -- James Madison, letter to W.T. Barry, August 4, 1822

It's hard for us average folks to follow the workings of the US Senate. Even the founding fathers struggled with keeping their new government on task and in focus. A full reading of the Senate's proceedings is such a daunting task, that it's output is unknown to much of America. Thus, as Madison warns, government is clearly now a Prologue to Farce, if not already past the prologue phase.

Occasionally, however, a resource like the National Taxpayer's Union is able to Capture and condense the sum and total of accomplishments for all to see. And the information at NTU.org is quite revealing:

We analyzed every roll call vote taken during 2007 (1st Session of the 110th Congress) and selected all votes that could significantly affect the amounts of federal taxes, spending, debt, or regulatory impact. -- NTU 2007 ratings

Selected results:

Senate Average: 37% (C-)

Hillary Clinton 3% (F)
Barry Obama 5% (F)
Joe Biden 4% (F)

The Silver Lining is this: With these 3 leaving the senate, the average score is almost guaranteed to go up.